Search
Search
Philip Umaru and Esther Temitayo Adelana
adopts Marxist Literary Theory as its theoretical framework, given its focus on class relations, power structures, exploitation, and social inequality. Although both novels represent institutional failure, abuse of power
Arilesere R. Mustapha and Funke J. Oni
economic deprivation and social exclusion. The lexical choices ideologically de-legitimise the party in power, frame it as incompetent and naturalise the need to have a more proactive and people
Emmanuel Ogbonna Okoro
study concludes that the judgment’s representation of social actors reflects and reproduces broader power dynamics and ideological contestation in Nigeria’s legal and political landscapes and CDA scholarship
Nwakaire Esther Nkechi, Ozor Gloria Nwando and David-Ojukwu Ifeyinwa
citizen-media comparison. It investigates how naming, framing, and metaphors construct gendered identities and power dynamics before and after the watershed event. Findings indicate tentative trends: male-authored texts tend
Andrew Ikpomwosa Egbah and Bridget Dahunsi Okunrobo
Dijk’s ideological square for analysing micro-interactional manifestations of status and power in Nigerian English- Pidgin discourse
Bukola Alfred, Morenike, Elizabeth Kolapo and Beke-ere Mienbi Singer
unique patterns of communication between family members, which unveils how they negotiate roles and power relations, and secure emotional connections. This paper explores visual and linguistic resources in selected Taaooma
Endurance Umhanlen and Esther Korakpe
linguistic and visual choices not only depict abuse but also assign responsibility, construct unequal power relations, and position viewers to recognise the rights and agency of PWDs. The study demonstrates
TIAMIYU, Abiola Jamiu, AJAPE, Enitan Jamiu and Adelola Betty Amihere
Igbo, Fulani, Obidient, and the Muslim-Muslim ticket to stake out positions on legitimacy, power, fairness, and national unity. Rather than treating these claims as settled fact, the analysis treats
Onyedikachi A. Okodo and Godwin Chibueze Didigwu
Political discourse is inherently competitive, with politicians deploying confrontational language to negotiate power, construct identities, and shape public perception. This study examines strategic impoliteness as a persuasive resource in Nyesom
Chidiebere Chukwuemeka Eze and Thomas-Michael Emeka Chukwumezie
Metaphor Theory as its principal analytical framework, while Quijano’s concept of coloniality of power and Mignolo’s decolonial perspective provide supporting conceptual context. Using qualitative close textual analysis